↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Online randomized controlled experiments at scale: lessons and extensions to medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online randomized controlled experiments at scale: lessons and extensions to medicine
Published in
Trials, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13063-020-4084-y
Pubmed ID
32033614
Authors

Ron Kohavi, Diane Tang, Ya Xu, Lars G. Hemkens, John P. A. Ioannidis

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 32 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Engineering 9 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 32 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,348,680
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#355
of 6,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,745
of 450,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#20
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.