You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multilevel Selection in Models of Prebiotic Evolution II: A Direct Comparison of Compartmentalization and Spatial Self-Organization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000542 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nobuto Takeuchi, Paulien Hogeweg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 39% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,474,480
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,550
of 9,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,411
of 108,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#26
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.