↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Percutaneous pinning for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006080.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexia Karantana, Helen HG Handoll, Ammar Sabouni

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 291 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Other 24 8%
Researcher 19 7%
Unspecified 16 5%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 110 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 5%
Unspecified 15 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 121 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,724,415
of 23,477,147 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,936
of 12,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,444
of 452,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,477,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.