↓ Skip to main content

Extensive Crosstalk between O-GlcNAcylation and Phosphorylation Regulates Akt Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extensive Crosstalk between O-GlcNAcylation and Phosphorylation Regulates Akt Signaling
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037427
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuai Wang, Xun Huang, Danni Sun, Xianliang Xin, Qiuming Pan, Shuying Peng, Zhongjie Liang, Cheng Luo, Yiming Yang, Hualiang Jiang, Min Huang, Wengang Chai, Jian Ding, Meiyu Geng

Abstract

O-linked N-acetylglucosamine glycosylations (O-GlcNAc) and O-linked phosphorylations (O-phosphate), as two important types of post-translational modifications, often occur on the same protein and bear a reciprocal relationship. In addition to the well documented phosphorylations that control Akt activity, Akt also undergoes O-GlcNAcylation, but the interplay between these two modifications and the biological significance remain unclear, largely due to the technique challenges. Here, we applied a two-step analytic approach composed of the O-GlcNAc immunoenrichment and subsequent O-phosphate immunodetection. Such an easy method enabled us to visualize endogenous glycosylated and phosphorylated Akt subpopulations in parallel and observed the inhibitory effect of Akt O-GlcNAcylations on its phosphorylation. Further studies utilizing mass spectrometry and mutagenesis approaches showed that O-GlcNAcylations at Thr 305 and Thr 312 inhibited Akt phosphorylation at Thr 308 via disrupting the interaction between Akt and PDK1. The impaired Akt activation in turn resulted in the compromised biological functions of Akt, as evidenced by suppressed cell proliferation and migration capabilities. Together, this study revealed an extensive crosstalk between O-GlcNAcylations and phosphorylations of Akt and demonstrated O-GlcNAcylation as a new regulatory modification for Akt signaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 2%
Japan 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 31%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 23%
Chemistry 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,779
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,416
of 164,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,979
of 3,781 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,781 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.