↓ Skip to main content

MAO-B Elevation in Mouse Brain Astrocytes Results in Parkinson's Pathology

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MAO-B Elevation in Mouse Brain Astrocytes Results in Parkinson's Pathology
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jyothi K. Mallajosyula, Deepinder Kaur, Shankar J. Chinta, Subramanian Rajagopalan, Anand Rane, David G. Nicholls, Donato A. Di Monte, Heather Macarthur, Julie K. Andersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 190 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 23%
Neuroscience 30 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Chemistry 11 6%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,627,027
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,014
of 195,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,035
of 80,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#42
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.