You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of Environmental Parameters on Marathon Running Performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037407 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nour El Helou, Muriel Tafflet, Geoffroy Berthelot, Julien Tolaini, Andy Marc, Marion Guillaume, Christophe Hausswirth, Jean-François Toussaint |
| Abstract |
The objectives of this study were to describe the distribution of all runners' performances in the largest marathons worldwide and to determine which environmental parameters have the maximal impact. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 20% |
| United States | 7 | 14% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 82% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 72 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 333. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#100,301
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,600
of 222,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390
of 178,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#17
of 3,815 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,815 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.