↓ Skip to main content

What Lies behind the Wish to Hasten Death? A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography from the Perspective of Patients

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Lies behind the Wish to Hasten Death? A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography from the Perspective of Patients
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Monforte-Royo, Christian Villavicencio-Chávez, Joaquin Tomás-Sábado, Vinita Mahtani-Chugani, Albert Balaguer

Abstract

There is a need for an in-depth approach to the meaning of the wish to hasten death (WTHD). This study aims to understand the experience of patients with serious or incurable illness who express such a wish.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 188 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 19%
Social Sciences 18 9%
Psychology 17 9%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 50 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,422,996
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#18,209
of 206,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,087
of 166,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#280
of 3,802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.