↓ Skip to main content

Improving Gender Equality in the Surgical Workplace—Reply

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Gender Equality in the Surgical Workplace—Reply
Published in
JAMA Surgery, May 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,039,582
of 22,070,821 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#1,065
of 3,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,827
of 376,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#23
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,070,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.