The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||21||45%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||16||34%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,359,979 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 382,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,359,979 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.