↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of recombination in coronaviruses implicating pangolin origins of nCoV-2019

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
139 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of recombination in coronaviruses implicating pangolin origins of nCoV-2019
Published in
bioRxiv
DOI 10.1101/2020.02.07.939207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wong, Matthew C., Javornik Cregeen, Sara J., Ajami, Nadim J., Petrosino, Joseph F.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 295 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 18%
Researcher 46 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Other 20 7%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 54 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 4%
Other 64 22%
Unknown 66 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#113,747
of 17,960,381 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#663
of 124,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,832
of 343,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#58
of 6,534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,960,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.