↓ Skip to main content

O uso de triangulação múltipla como estratégia de validação em um estudo qualitativo

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
O uso de triangulação múltipla como estratégia de validação em um estudo qualitativo
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, February 2020
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karine da Silva Santos, Mara Cristina Ribeiro, Danlyne Eduarda Ulisses de Queiroga, Ivisson Alexandre Pereira da Silva, Sonia Maria Soares Ferreira

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 363 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Lecturer 16 4%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 178 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 29 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Arts and Humanities 16 4%
Psychology 14 4%
Other 74 20%
Unknown 188 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,992,299
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#1,521
of 1,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,103
of 477,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#52
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.