You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
1051: CHANGES IN THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DIGITAL FOOTPRINT AT THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1097/01.ccm.0000643140.91732.5e |
| Authors |
Christopher Carroll, Tamas Szakmany, Neha Dangayach, Ashley DePriest, Matthew Duprey, Viren Kaul, Ruth Kleinpell, Kenneth Tegtmeyer, Sapna Kudchadkar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 80% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,544,955
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,408
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,927
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#75
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.