↓ Skip to main content

1051: CHANGES IN THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DIGITAL FOOTPRINT AT THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1051: CHANGES IN THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DIGITAL FOOTPRINT AT THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, January 2020
DOI 10.1097/01.ccm.0000643140.91732.5e
Authors

Christopher Carroll, Tamas Szakmany, Neha Dangayach, Ashley DePriest, Matthew Duprey, Viren Kaul, Ruth Kleinpell, Kenneth Tegtmeyer, Sapna Kudchadkar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,608,399
of 16,995,670 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,073
of 8,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,276
of 264,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#75
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,995,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.