You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An experimental study of voting rules and polls in three-candidate elections
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Game Theory, September 1996
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02425262 |
Authors |
Robert Forsythe, Thomas Rietz, Roger Myerson, Robert Weber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 42 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 28% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 21% |
Computer Science | 5 | 12% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,549
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#94
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,897
of 29,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.