You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Botulinum toxin A as an adjunct to treatment in the management of the upper limb in children with spastic cerebral palsy (UPDATE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003469.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian J Hoare, Margaret A Wallen, Christine Imms, Elmer Villanueva, Hyam Barry Rawicki, Leeanne Carey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 523 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 90 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 11% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 109 | 20% |
| Unknown | 134 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 11% |
| Psychology | 28 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 13% |
| Unknown | 162 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,377,858
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,534
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,906
of 174,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.