↓ Skip to main content

A Method to Estimate Relative Recruitment from Cagch-at-Age Data Using Fuzzy Control Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries Science, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Method to Estimate Relative Recruitment from Cagch-at-Age Data Using Fuzzy Control Theory
Published in
Fisheries Science, January 1995
DOI 10.2331/fishsci.61.401
Authors

Kazumi Sakuramoto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1998.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#148
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,221
of 76,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.