↓ Skip to main content

An evaluation of Regional Fisheries Management Organization at-sea compliance monitoring and observer programs

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Policy, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
An evaluation of Regional Fisheries Management Organization at-sea compliance monitoring and observer programs
Published in
Marine Policy, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103842
Authors

Christopher Ewell, John Hocevar, Elizabeth Mitchell, Samantha Snowden, Jennifer Jacquet

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#309,064
of 15,038,563 outputs
Outputs from Marine Policy
#64
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,036
of 243,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Policy
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,038,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.