You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rethinking the electronic health record through the quadruple aim: time to align its value with the health system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-1048-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hassane Alami, Pascale Lehoux, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Jean-Paul Fortin, Richard Fleet, Mohamed Ali Ag Ahmed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 32% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Kenya | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Georgia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,066,762
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#216
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,379
of 385,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.