You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
変形性関節症はなぜ痛いのか?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.11321/jjspc.19-0018 |
| Authors |
石黒 直樹, 原田 紀子, 江端 望, 藤井 幸一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 12 | 29% |
| Haiti | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,184,461
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#1
of 109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,384
of 476,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Pain Clinicians
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 109 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them