You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Correlation between biomarkers of exposure, effect and potential harm in the urine of electronic cigarette users
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, February 2020
Shane Sakamaki-Ching, Monique Williams, My Hua, Jun Li, Steve M Bates, Andrew N Robinson, Timothy W Lyons, Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz, Prue Talbot
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||14||78%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||9||19%|
|Student > Master||6||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||6%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||5||10%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||4||8%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||6%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 365,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.