You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cervical, Anal and Oral HPV in an Adolescent Inner-City Health Clinic Providing Free Vaccinations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas F. Schlecht, Robert D. Burk, Anne Nucci-Sack, Viswanathan Shankar, Ken Peake, Elizabeth Lorde-Rollins, Richard Porter, Lourdes Oriana Linares, Mary Rojas, Howard D. Strickler, Angela Diaz |
| Abstract |
Published human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine trials indicate efficacy is strongest for those naive to the vaccine-types. However, few high-risk young women have been followed and cervical HPV has been the predominant outcome measure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2012.
All research outputs
#13,663,849
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,416
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,127
of 163,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,070
of 3,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.