You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury in Kidney Transplantation: Relevant Mechanisms in Injury and Repair
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jcm9010253 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gertrude J. Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke, Søren E. Pischke, Stefan P. Berger, Jan Stephan F. Sanders, Robert A. Pol, Michel M. R. F. Struys, Rutger J. Ploeg, Henri G. D. Leuvenink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 81 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 89 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,048,038
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#5,886
of 12,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,918
of 455,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#235
of 475 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 475 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.