You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-Visual Effects of Light on Melatonin, Alertness and Cognitive Performance: Can Blue-Enriched Light Keep Us Alert?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016429 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Laxhmi Chellappa, Roland Steiner, Peter Blattner, Peter Oelhafen, Thomas Götz, Christian Cajochen |
Abstract |
Light exposure can cascade numerous effects on the human circadian process via the non-imaging forming system, whose spectral relevance is highest in the short-wavelength range. Here we investigated if commercially available compact fluorescent lamps with different colour temperatures can impact on alertness and cognitive performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 14 | 36% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 36 | 92% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 618 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 597 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 101 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 98 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 95 | 15% |
Researcher | 81 | 13% |
Other | 26 | 4% |
Other | 98 | 16% |
Unknown | 119 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 96 | 16% |
Engineering | 58 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 50 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 7% |
Other | 166 | 27% |
Unknown | 155 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#497,093
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,852
of 225,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,085
of 196,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#40
of 1,312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.