↓ Skip to main content

Structural Similarity and Classification of Protein Interaction Interfaces

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural Similarity and Classification of Protein Interaction Interfaces
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nan Zhao, Bin Pang, Chi-Ren Shyu, Dmitry Korkin

Abstract

Interactions between proteins play a key role in many cellular processes. Studying protein-protein interactions that share similar interaction interfaces may shed light on their evolution and could be helpful in elucidating the mechanisms behind stability and dynamics of the protein complexes. When two complexes share structurally similar subunits, the similarity of the interaction interfaces can be found through a structural superposition of the subunits. However, an accurate detection of similarity between the protein complexes containing subunits of unrelated structure remains an open problem. Here, we present an alignment-free machine learning approach to measure interface similarity. The approach relies on the feature-based representation of protein interfaces and does not depend on the superposition of the interacting subunit pairs. Specifically, we develop an SVM classifier of similar and dissimilar interfaces and derive a feature-based interface similarity measure. Next, the similarity measure is applied to a set of 2,806×2,806 binary complex pairs to build a hierarchical classification of protein-protein interactions. Finally, we explore case studies of similar interfaces from each level of the hierarchy, considering cases when the subunits forming interactions are either homologous or structurally unrelated. The analysis has suggested that the positions of charged residues in the homologous interfaces are not necessarily conserved and may exhibit more complex conservation patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 30%
Researcher 9 18%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 32%
Computer Science 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,779
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,690
of 109,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,391
of 1,633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.