You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arthritis & Rheumatology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/art.41191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa R. Sammaritano, Bonnie L. Bermas, Eliza E. Chakravarty, Christina Chambers, Megan E. B. Clowse, Michael D. Lockshin, Wendy Marder, Gordon Guyatt, D. Ware Branch, Jill Buyon, Lisa Christopher‐Stine, Rachelle Crow‐Hercher, John Cush, Maurice Druzin, Arthur Kavanaugh, Carl A. Laskin, Lauren Plante, Jane Salmon, Julia Simard, Emily C. Somers, Virginia Steen, Sara K. Tedeschi, Evelyne Vinet, C. Whitney White, Jinoos Yazdany, Medha Barbhaiya, Brittany Bettendorf, Amanda Eudy, Arundathi Jayatilleke, Amit Aakash Shah, Nancy Sullivan, Laura L. Tarter, Mehret Birru Talabi, Marat Turgunbaev, Amy Turner, Kristen E. D'Anci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 14% |
| Spain | 11 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 9% |
| Mexico | 10 | 8% |
| India | 5 | 4% |
| Colombia | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 15% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 391 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 9% |
| Researcher | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 21% |
| Unknown | 135 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 163 | 42% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 11% |
| Unknown | 142 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#219,467
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#69
of 3,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,006
of 386,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis & Rheumatology
#2
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.