↓ Skip to main content

Physical fitness and physical activity association with cognitive function and quality of life: baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus trial

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical fitness and physical activity association with cognitive function and quality of life: baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus trial
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-59458-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidia Daimiel, Miguel A. Martínez-González, Dolores Corella, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Helmut Schröder, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, J. Alfredo Martínez, Julia Wärnberg, Jose Lopez-Miranda, Ramón Estruch, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Angel Alonso-Gómez, Josep A. Tur, Francisco J. Tinahones, Lluis Serra-Majem, Rafael M. Micó-Pérez, José Lapetra, Alba Galdón, Xavier Pintó, Josep Vidal, Victor Micó, Gonzalo Colmenarejo, José J. Gaforio, Pilar Matía, Emilio Ros, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Zenaida Vázquez-Ruiz, José V. Sorlí, Indira Paz Graniel, Aida Cuenca-Royo, Cristina Gisbert-Sellés, Aina M. Galmes-Panades, M. Angeles Zulet, Antonio García-Ríos, Andrés Díaz-López, Rafael de la Torre, Iñigo Galilea-Zabalza, José M. Ordovás

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 272 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 8%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Master 16 6%
Other 12 4%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 127 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Sports and Recreations 19 7%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Psychology 10 4%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 141 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,508,398
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#34,779
of 125,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,300
of 360,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,207
of 4,211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.