↓ Skip to main content

Physical fitness and physical activity association with cognitive function and quality of life: baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus trial

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical fitness and physical activity association with cognitive function and quality of life: baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus trial
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-59458-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daimiel, Lidia, Martínez-González, Miguel A., Corella, Dolores, Salas-Salvadó, Jordi, Schröder, Helmut, Vioque, Jesús, Romaguera, Dora, Martínez, J. Alfredo, Wärnberg, Julia, Lopez-Miranda, Jose, Estruch, Ramón, Cano-Ibáñez, Naomi, Alonso-Gómez, Angel, Tur, Josep A., Tinahones, Francisco J., Serra-Majem, Lluis, Micó-Pérez, Rafael M., Lapetra, José, Galdón, Alba, Pintó, Xavier, Vidal, Josep, Micó, Victor, Colmenarejo, Gonzalo, Gaforio, José J., Matía, Pilar, Ros, Emilio, Buil-Cosiales, Pilar, Vázquez-Ruiz, Zenaida, Sorlí, José V., Graniel, Indira Paz, Cuenca-Royo, Aida, Gisbert-Sellés, Cristina, Galmes-Panades, Aina M., Zulet, M. Angeles, García-Ríos, Antonio, Díaz-López, Andrés, de la Torre, Rafael, Galilea-Zabalza, Iñigo, Ordovás, José M.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Neuroscience 6 10%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 20 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,040,494
of 16,164,368 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#23,061
of 85,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,859
of 257,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#4
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,164,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 85,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.