@BrechtDurnez @timdmmm Wel dat had ik v auteurs vh rapport verwacht, maar hier alvast https://t.co/KAWh2kFSDB
Tämä muistettava kun testataan !!! Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https://t.co/vp8XPS5YgR
RT @longtentacles1: https://t.co/8TQ0ekN7Pa PCRが精度がないと一般医師に妄信させた論文ソース の一つ。CTとPCRの両方を受けた人に対して、PCRでコロナかどうかをチェックしたら、59% (601/1014) が陽性でした。→ 感…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
@UGruntmanis @LieneCipule @NeredzamaGaisma @Vinkele @NMPdienests Es domāju tādi pētījumi jau ir, vajag tikai meklēt un var atrast. Ātrumā atradu https://t.co/8VIdZrHZZn . Man liekas ir daudzmaz par tēmu, drošvien ir labāki.
@yaneerbaryam @hjluks @cdipaola62 @NAChristakis This Chinese report was published already on 26.2. about the same thing. Almost 2 months ago. The CT techinique was largely used in Wuhan as PCR was taking too long time to give results. First #CT -> later
RT @KarenMPSP: Tener reserva con los resultados negativos, sobre todo cuando no se puede o no es necesario correlacionar con imagenes de TA…
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Väitteet virustestin herkkyydestä vaikuttavat ylioptimistisilta. Kaksi julkaisua alla. Toisessa nenä- ja nenänielunäyttei…
Tener reserva con los resultados negativos, sobre todo cuando no se puede o no es necesario correlacionar con imagenes de TAC. https://t.co/Qlj6YOc724
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Väitteet virustestin herkkyydestä vaikuttavat ylioptimistisilta. Kaksi julkaisua alla. Toisessa nenä- ja nenänielunäyttei…
RT @JuhaniKnuuti: Väitteet virustestin herkkyydestä vaikuttavat ylioptimistisilta. Kaksi julkaisua alla. Toisessa nenä- ja nenänielunäyttei…
@kojiego 感度を出す為のreferenceがないので、推定値ですが、以下のような文献が根拠ですね。 本名?SNSで貴方に個人情報晒す必要性が不明です。 https://t.co/CjyMqoPUHP https://t.co/S5aWwc04Wv
Väitteet virustestin herkkyydestä vaikuttavat ylioptimistisilta. Kaksi julkaisua alla. Toisessa nenä- ja nenänielunäytteiden herkkyys on 32-63% ja toisessa 59% (vaihteluväli 56-62%). Millä perusteella HUS:n testi olisi parempi? https://t.co/kW5GuWUDjB htt
RT @abreu1710: Diagnóstico temprano y oportuno de COVID correlacionando tomografía de tórax y PCR-RT en 1014 pacientes de Wuhan. La TAC 97%…
COVID tests have massive false negatives because getting a good RNA sample is tough to do. But chest scans work. This big study found 48% who passed swab test were actually sick, but that chest scans catch 97% of Covid-19 infections. https://t.co/yuntfw
RT @longtentacles1: https://t.co/8TQ0ekN7Pa PCRが精度がないと一般医師に妄信させた論文ソース の一つ。CTとPCRの両方を受けた人に対して、PCRでコロナかどうかをチェックしたら、59% (601/1014) が陽性でした。→ 感…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
RT @yuta_shirodora: @canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね…
@canchemistry そもそも偽陰性率が高いというソースを見たこと無いので、嘘を繰り返して言えば事実として扱われる感が否めないですが(^_^;) まあ高低は相対的なものなので、何と比べて低いのか言ってもらわないとおかしいですよね あと他のウイルスの検査でも100%の検出はできませんよね https://t.co/JqqpgPA6hU
@Majed__1988 There are reports of many cases presented with PE and portal vein thrombosis CT chest is recommended for suspected cases of #COVID2019 https://t.co/aJJtbppJia
RT @WhaleCamo: @Tomo20309138 中国ではエピデミック地域でのCOVID-19診断にPCRよりCTが有効と、1014名の患者症例から導き出してますね。 Chest CT had higher sensitivity for diagnosis of C…
@Anhaeuser @evibase @Spiegel Studie aus Wuhan aus Anfang März https://t.co/lhsZEmcZ8K https://t.co/cGlovQ4L4v
@bealelab @Babak_Javid_Lab It's not the qPCR that can give false -ves, definitely agree with you on that. However, sampling OP/NP swabs is not straightforward + inherent RNA instability both can contribute. Published data show the RT-PCR method isn't the m
Not sure why I even have to say this but identifying positive patients accurately so they can get treated is a good thing. If you want to read about doomsday, please follow CNN. https://t.co/NNEQURnvXM https://t.co/fSau1E0Gi8
@elnahual__ @pokepedi @LuisInsulina Por otro lado, con respecto a los estudios, cito al artículo https://t.co/GkVrkhR7r6, al usar ensayos de qRT-PCR con una tasa positiva relativamente baja como referencia, la sensibilidad de la TC de tórax para COVID-19 p
RT @HasanYavash: Çin'de testi negatif gelenlerin, %75'inde tomografi sonucu covid19 teşhis edilmiş. Konuyla alakalı makale: https://t.co/P…
@jtnssava @thewanreport I only deal with FACTS & here they are that China used test & CT scans to determine if someone had COVID19 https://t.co/joTtsmjL23
@Panda_Lv0 おまえこそ読んだのか? ざっくり言った要訳が間違ってるぞ PCRとRT-PCRの比較じゃなくて CTをやった人間の中でRT-PCRをやって、肺炎とコロナ肺炎の比率を出したものだぞ #新型コロナウイルス https://t.co/JqqpgPA6hU
@luna_ml619 @Panda_Lv0 コイツも付けときますね #市中感染 #経路不明感染 #無症状感染 #新型コロナウイルス https://t.co/JqqpgPA6hU
@Steph_Achenbach Some data also showing contrary: only 65% PCR results positive in presence of typical Covid CT. https://t.co/usK1H9UjcX
@FabioMontale @crislomb Studio clinico su 1014 pazienti in cina, 48% “highly likely”, 30% “probable” su un campione positivo del 75% dei casi https://t.co/pnlTDrzIxp
Corona virüs salgınında nüfus yoğunluğu, Cuma gecesi herkesin markete saldırması, çalışmaya devam etmesi gerekenlerin fazlalığı gibi faktörler aleyhimize ama PCR testlerinin ıskalayacağı hastaları BT ve diğer klinik bulgularla kaçırmayak doktorlarımız var.
RT @radiology_rsna: In a study of 1,014 patients published today in @radiology_rsna, chest CT outperformed RT-PCR lab testing in the diagno…
@smithECGBlog Depends on sensitivity and specificity of the test used. In China chest CT had better sensitivity than RT-PCR https://t.co/0dOnwsbWyD
In patients with negative RT-PCR results, 75% (n = 308) had positive chest CT findings. Infection after test or poor test sensitivity????@EMARIANOMD @drsanjaygupta https://t.co/8nkqTUhH6p
@oriolmitja @_MrDarwin_ Chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of COVID-19. Chest CT may be considered as a primary tool for the current COVID-19 detection in epidemic areas. https://t.co/W9SDqnLlSq
@SianneSymone https://t.co/sTVyJKy1ZG This is the study from China.
@CarolineYLChen @NickFalacci @lydiadepillis @kate_sheppard @nature Comparison of test modalities https://t.co/FrH8yUHovM And this article is why so many countries use CT to diagnose patients with symptoms whose tests may be false negative for 3-5 days http
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases | Radiology https://t.co/rldgVrBQ8l
@JervisCapital @themohwgovjm This is the evidence for doing CT to test for Covid https://t.co/sTVyJKy1ZG
RT @abreu1710: Diagnóstico temprano y oportuno de COVID correlacionando tomografía de tórax y PCR-RT en 1014 pacientes de Wuhan. La TAC 97%…
@rhizophil https://t.co/sTVyJKy1ZG Here is the landmark study comparing Chest CT to PCR. You can start with that. 🙃
@yaneerbaryam Here’s a ref to support https://t.co/CeCgoEB2xk Mildly sympt pt’s false neg by RT-PCR, confirmed early by CT Covid test then converts to pos. Diagnose by: History, Physical Exam, Imaging, Lab tests. Lab tests are not 100% sensitive MD
@DFisman Thinking ahead to resuming urgent-elective surgery. Colleagues at UHN are swabbing patients 24-48h preop then having them self-isolate until admission. Sounds good, but wonder about false negative PCR. 30% in study below. Are you aware of other da
@yuki0789 https://t.co/SPcPO2QYK1 COVID-19に対するRT-PCRの感度は6割からそれ以下という説が主流かと思われます。 100%というのはどういう状況下での何に対するどんな値なのかわかりかねますので、何とも言えませんねえ。
@AsianIcequeen Folks smarter than me raise the issue of false negative rate of RT-PCR in asymptomatic patients. Li Wenliang had 2 negative PCRs. This paper from Wuhan pegs senstivity at around 70%. Good if positive, if negative ... ? https://t.co/puMaPMqQ
RT @ProfDemartines: We just found one suspect CT in an asymptomatic patient post pancreas resection #COVID19 @VisceralChuv https://t.co/Twa…
RT @ProfDemartines: We just found one suspect CT in an asymptomatic patient post pancreas resection #COVID19 @VisceralChuv
RT @ProfDemartines: We just found one suspect CT in an asymptomatic patient post pancreas resection #COVID19 @VisceralChuv
We just found one suspect CT in an asymptomatic patient post pancreas resection #COVID19 @VisceralChuv
@hannestschuertz @chorherr Ist da auch schon eingerechnet, dass der PCR Test anscheinend auch false negative Ergebnisse liefert? (75% der in der Studie negativ getesteten hatten Covid https://t.co/7whlpD8jYz)
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
PCR検査による確定診断を基準としたCT検査の感度調査 PCR検査陽性患者でのCT検査の感度97% #PCR検査 https://t.co/pJA8xSkukF
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
I don't know how that link went awry, I meant https://t.co/5D499wUGL5
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
@tomfolanmd Sensitivity is 30-40% higher in CT. Just saying https://t.co/Hz5W0qJuOD
@emmarcourt You really should read literature b/4 sounding silly https://t.co/Hz5W0qJuOD
RT @drxliem1: Allons y pour les scan tho à tout le monde !
Allons y pour les scan tho à tout le monde !
RT @chris_nahm: Seeing pts with clinically suspected #covid19 with negative (sometimes multiple) swabs but positive CT. Large study from Wu…
Seeing pts with clinically suspected #covid19 with negative (sometimes multiple) swabs but positive CT. Large study from Wuhan group shows chest CT findings may precede swab RT-PCR positivity in a sig proportion of pts. https://t.co/luxf8qcvBO https://t.co
@BWildeGlobal Hopefully testing will improve to the accuracy of CT scans. The possibility for a false negative is concerning (https://t.co/Xc0nNsMaVo)
Diagnóstico temprano y oportuno de COVID correlacionando tomografía de tórax y PCR-RT en 1014 pacientes de Wuhan. La TAC 97% sensitividad con PCR+ y 60%sensitividad con PCR-. Característico cambios de vidrio esmerilado y condensaciones, ver hilo #COVID19.
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @lauremarignol: A fantastic example of how #imaging and #biology can be related. #ResearchMatters #Covid_19 https://t.co/mBirMJbDh3
A fantastic example of how #imaging and #biology can be related. #ResearchMatters #Covid_19
@tnicholsmd @ETSshow @choo_ek @darakass @AliRaja_MD @jeremyfaust @tmprowell @DrChoueiri @NicoleKuderer @pash22 Finding high sensitivity for initial CT findings so that may be a separate trial for PUIs in a well-defined cohort of older patients https://t.co
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
RT @NicholasZaorsky: Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID1…
Correlation of chest CT and RT PCR testing for COVID-19, report of 1014 cases from Wuhan. @RSNA @ABR_Radiology #COVID19 https://t.co/vAkfWz8lYB Thanks @StevenLin_MDPhD https://t.co/saM1GpMOMp
@A_Veganista @denverpost The Chinese ophthalmologist who originally sounded the alarm about coronavirus, Li Wenliang, had several negative tests. He died from covid-19. Many people with covid have false negative test results, up to 25% or more. https://t
@mostthingsking @TheTerribleTout @rolbev It’s not really screening I agree. But there is an issue with the false negative rate. Look at the study attached https://t.co/sTVyJKgqB6
@ShlomitTamir @Z6M7w1iXaLC6IM0 היה מאמר אחד בסין שהשווה בין CT ל PCR והראה שהראשון רגיש יותר הנה פה https://t.co/MCT1JpmSaa
@gramatterz @hendysh Sorry to jump in Samantha, this is a concern of mine too. Did you see https://t.co/tNePd28LJ2? I plugged the numbers into a 2x2 & got a sensitivity for PCR of 65% (95%CI 62% to 68%)
RT @M_Dhyani: @DrTravisScott Absolutely retest & above all else - medicine team should absolutely maintain precautions...!!! https://t.co/X…
@happyandpeace 引用元の文献はこちら。 https://t.co/5m9caVZN0z 引用元の文献では、胸部CTを推奨しています。 なお、日本はこのCTがOECD平均の4.1倍という高い水準で導入されています。