↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Summary Wikipedia Research highlights Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008197.pub2
Pubmed ID
22419329
Authors

Charlie C-T Hsu, Gigi NC Kwan, Mieke L van Driel, John A Rophael

Abstract

During thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) surgery, decreased spinal cord perfusion can result in neurological deficits such as paraplegia and paraparesis. Distal aortic perfusion, alone or in combination with other adjuncts, may counter the decrease in spinal cord perfusion and hence reduce the risk of spinal cord injury.

View on publisher site

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 2 2%
Computer Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,379,134
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,201
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,439
of 156,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.