↓ Skip to main content

Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distal aortic perfusion during thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair for prevention of paraplegia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008197.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlie C-T Hsu, Gigi NC Kwan, Mieke L van Driel, John A Rophael

Abstract

During thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) surgery, decreased spinal cord perfusion can result in neurological deficits such as paraplegia and paraparesis. Distal aortic perfusion, alone or in combination with other adjuncts, may counter the decrease in spinal cord perfusion and hence reduce the risk of spinal cord injury.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#3,177,142
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,449
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,173
of 118,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.