You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Visual Scan Paths and Recognition of Facial Identity in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0037681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Ellie Wilson, Romina Palermo, Jon Brock |
| Abstract |
Previous research suggests that many individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have impaired facial identity recognition, and also exhibit abnormal visual scanning of faces. Here, two hypotheses accounting for an association between these observations were tested: i) better facial identity recognition is associated with increased gaze time on the Eye region; ii) better facial identity recognition is associated with increased eye-movements around the face. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 54 | 54% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,139,469
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#51,040
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,974
of 179,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#739
of 3,771 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,771 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.