↓ Skip to main content

Advance care planning for adults with heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance care planning for adults with heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013022.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuri Nishikawa, Natsuko Hiroyama, Hiroki Fukahori, Erika Ota, Atsushi Mizuno, Mitsunori Miyashita, Daisuke Yoneoka, Joey SW Kwong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 17 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2020.
All research outputs
#794,326
of 16,241,127 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,149
of 11,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,731
of 256,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,241,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.