↓ Skip to main content

Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 671)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saliva samples are a viable alternative to blood samples as a source of DNA for high throughput genotyping
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1755-8794-5-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean E Abraham, Mel J Maranian, Inmaculada Spiteri, Roslin Russell, Susan Ingle, Craig Luccarini, Helena M Earl, Paul PD Pharoah, Alison M Dunning, Carlos Caldas, Abraham JE, Maranian MJ, Spiteri I, Russell R, Ingle S, Luccarini C, Earl HM, Pharoah PD, Dunning AM, Caldas C

Abstract

The increasing trend for incorporation of biological sample collection within clinical trials requires sample collection procedures which are convenient and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. This study investigated the feasibility of using saliva-extracted DNA in comparison to blood-derived DNA, across two genotyping platforms: Applied Biosystems Taqman™ and Illumina Beadchip™ genome-wide arrays.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 22%
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Psychology 6 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 23 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,087,570
of 13,327,609 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#50
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,595
of 121,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,327,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them