You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gallstones top to toe: what the radiologist needs to know
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-019-0825-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. C. Murphy, B. Gibney, C. Gillespie, J. Hynes, F. Bolster |
| Abstract |
Gallstone-related disease can have significant associated morbidity and mortality worldwide. The incidence of gallstone-related disease in the Western world is on the increase. There are multiple different pathological manifestations of gallstone disease: the presentation, diagnosis and associated complications of which vary significantly depending on anatomical location. The role of imaging in gallstone-related disease is broad with radiology playing an essential role in the diagnosis, management and follow-up of gallstone-related pathologies. This paper distills the broad range of gallstone-related pathologies into an anatomical map, discussing the disease processes involved at each point along the biliary tree and reviewing the strengths and weaknesses of different imaging modalities for each distinct disease process. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 8% |
| Austria | 1 | 8% |
| Hungary | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 94 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 99 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,890,759
of 24,469,913 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#295
of 1,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,509
of 459,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,469,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.