↓ Skip to main content

Isolation of intact sub-dermal secretory cavities from Eucalyptus

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isolation of intact sub-dermal secretory cavities from Eucalyptus
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-6-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason QD Goodger, Allison M Heskes, Madeline C Mitchell, Drew J King, Elizabeth H Neilson, Ian E Woodrow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Algeria 1 2%
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Chemistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#8,781,252
of 25,978,998 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#595
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,087
of 106,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,978,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.