↓ Skip to main content

Electronic health records in ambulances: the ERA multiple-methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services and Delivery Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic health records in ambulances: the ERA multiple-methods study
Published in
Health Services and Delivery Research, February 2020
DOI 10.3310/hsdr08100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Porter, Anisha Badshah, Sarah Black, David Fitzpatrick, Robert Harris-Mayes, Saiful Islam, Matthew Jones, Mark Kingston, Yvette LaFlamme-Williams, Suzanne Mason, Katherine McNee, Heather Morgan, Zoe Morrison, Pauline Mountain, Henry Potts, Nigel Rees, Debbie Shaw, Niro Siriwardena, Helen Snooks, Rob Spaight, Victoria Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#973,013
of 15,842,641 outputs
Outputs from Health Services and Delivery Research
#65
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,792
of 257,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services and Delivery Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,842,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them