You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Regional dust storm modeling for health services: The case of valley fever
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aeolian Research, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.03.001 |
Authors |
William A. Sprigg, Slobodan Nickovic, John N. Galgiani, Goran Pejanovic, Slavko Petkovic, Mirjam Vujadinovic, Ana Vukovic, Milan Dacic, Scott DiBiase, Anup Prasad, Hesham El-Askary |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 25% |
Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Professor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 28 | 24% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 17% |
Engineering | 11 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,655,552
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Aeolian Research
#18
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,108
of 248,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aeolian Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.