RT @DrTomFrieden: 19/ The folks who know this area best tend to doubt this theory, though, and early data from a pre-print from China that…
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/1pZ8NKafno @BluRadioCo @IvanDuque @jsanchezcristo @sebastianpinera @JuanPabloCalvas
RT @PMompirri: On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/LCHYjCKqBU
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/LCHYjCKqBU
19/ The folks who know this area best tend to doubt this theory, though, and early data from a pre-print from China that suggested there are different types of the virus doesn’t seem to have been replicated. https://t.co/PqQLHxRXg3
@ClarkeMicah @Mat_wt Have you seen this? https://t.co/W7kxIn57vF I’d love to know your thoughts.
RT @VirgileRICHARD3: #RaTG13 It looks like the CCP army of scientists is in full swing to cover up Shi Zhengli's mess. https://t.co/iG1ABBn…
Thank you
@T_Emmert @tagesschau Das nennt man Studien, Herr Emnert. https://t.co/qGYG1Ln1kG
@BrandonWong94 @catcontentonly When is comes to medical science, focus on articles with peer-to-peer review. The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic started in late December 2019 in #Wuhan, China, and has since impacted a large portion of China and raised major global co
@similiasimilis @Manikamoral https://t.co/bClagg88zD Şunu da bırakayım.... Not: Tıp ile temel bilimleri karıştırmayalım.
RT @halgawi: أتمنى من المختصين و المسؤولين قراءة هذه الدراسة المتعلقة بفايروس كورونا التي نشرت قبل يومين وترجمتها إلى اللغة العربية ، بدلاً…
Population genetic analyses of 103 SARS-CoV-2 genomes indicated that these viruses had two major lineages (designated L and S), that are well defined by two different SNPs that show nearly complete linkage across the viral strains sequenced to date. http
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
@serdardirican @ghotamis En yakın olarak sunulan RatG13 Yarasa Coronavirüs ile de aslında çok daha fazla fark oldugunu gösteren çalışma : https://t.co/Fepj2DcdI2
@serdardirican @HikmetGeckil @ghotamis RatG13 ile de aslında çok benzemediği ile igili çalışma https://t.co/Fepj2DcdI2
@sass_byname @GuffyNicola @ClarkeMicah That's from a blog post, not a scientific paper. https://t.co/Kp0WemQPwm
@KhaledATalaat Hi. You have probably read these preprints but they highlight how exceptional #RaTG13->SARS-CoV-2 synonymous "mutations" are. https://t.co/bn7OwKC87g https://t.co/dKk4OKffiA
@seijichishin 陰性者が再度陽性になる事例が増えています。中国から強力なL型の新型コロナウイルスが入る恐れがある期間は慎重になってほしいです。→Tangらが3月3日に発表した論文 https://t.co/8RRAdcCgI9 で、新型コロナウイルス L型はS型が変異して生じた。L型の方がより感染力が強い。武漢ではL型が多かった
Checking which whitepapers are trending with regards to #COVID19, this journal is under the @oupacademic umbrella- On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/WbVdYasd4m #Healthinnovations #pharma #health #coronavirus via @NSR_Family
@onepondster @PierreRevellin by Robertson and Maclean, the Glasgow Ockham's Razor Gang ;) in their critique of purported "L and S" strains, a controversial issue it seems: https://t.co/gCFIHxNZ52 for ugly critique based on some rather sketchy arguments fro
@Nick_Goldman Two papers you might find interesting [1] https://t.co/bn7OwKC87g [2] https://t.co/dKk4OKffiA
@GambottiHamann @indy_yet De la bouche même des auteurs de l'article (https://t.co/68YmmR4LIW), les résultats sont à prendre avec beaucoup de précautions : “Les données examinées dans cette étude sont encore très limitées”. Ils insistent également sur le “
@imamura_kansen @sendaitribune ウイルスが2種類いる件はこの中国の研究が大元ですよね。この研究では武漢で蔓延したウイルスは強いタイプが70%とか、組成が違うから強さが異なるとか、色々と言っているようですが、英大学からは都合良く解釈しただけの研究だっていう指摘が入ったって事でしょうか。 https://t.co/LW5dGLPbBX
@MrGmoneygp @Qualifyfor @USlawreview And what constitutes proof for you? Being infected? You no doubt woukd rather believe that every country in the world is collaborating in a massive conspiracy. https://t.co/YwDvrSgSJb https://t.co/bHQy5lY0g0 https:
@Ayjchan @CarltheChippy @8sofia288 Pangolins aren’t part of the picture, neutral site analysis makes it “very unlikely” https://t.co/QukcDbjuMy
RT @LL202020: @Tom_Fowdy Look at the full pdf of this paper. Go to Page 20, Fig 4. 105 samples were studied. 28 or about 1/3 are from Wuhan…
#RaTG13 It looks like the CCP army of scientists is in full swing to cover up Shi Zhengli's mess. https://t.co/iG1ABBnM14 https://t.co/HCzJN45KNG https://t.co/j2AMmFbh2n https://t.co/Xpf03RWEr3 https://t.co/6ZmSqVvnlr https://t.co/ABtNy5etGZ https://t.co/f
@Seputv Aquí lo puedes leer https://t.co/p3bKG5IEKC
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/p3bKG5IEKC Pues nada que detectaron dos cepas del #Covid19 por si te interesa @CloudOfUniverse @chocodonte
@alfonslopeztena The LA Times published this story on 5 March 2020: https://t.co/AYnGPlboaM Here is the NSR article to which the 5 March LA times story refers: https://t.co/tqMkH7JrVN
60 Days Ago: https://t.co/AZgrH31fzv
RT @BrianRWasik: I just passed along this paper by @robertson_lab and others as context to my commentary about #SARSCoV2. The paper is in…
@Shermichael_ @ZerlinaMaxwell That is nothing new. There is a S-type and a L-type strain. https://t.co/aumi1ag42L https://t.co/B0D5mlSrry
RT @JaneOrLean: @TroyNaismith1 @BotanDove @cryptanonomous @yogibear951 @Mareq16 here's the original research from China https://t.co/xs5ILD…
@ZerlinaMaxwell Oh... no. This article is irresponsible in that it doesnt really challenge the findings of that paper. It was good work, but researchers stuck their neck out too far and got press. Finding a 'new strain' is not trivial. We have no evidence
I think this was CCP's real shot at destroying global economy. Wuhan version clearly man-made. This study "discredited" due to lack of peer review: https://t.co/I8UZto1lDr CCP released Type S strain first to give immunity to most of their people. https://t
RT @miriamorcutt: @globalhlthtwit Chinese data seems to show that new strain has already emerged --> there are two strains currently circul…
RT @BrianRWasik: I just passed along this paper by @robertson_lab and others as context to my commentary about #SARSCoV2. The paper is in…
RT @BrianRWasik: I just passed along this paper by @robertson_lab and others as context to my commentary about #SARSCoV2. The paper is in…
I just passed along this paper by @robertson_lab and others as context to my commentary about #SARSCoV2. The paper is in response to Tang et al (https://t.co/1wnIceOWZQ), implying two 'strains' S and L, having differential transmission based on prevelance
@SJR78354712 From memory it was the one not tied to the seafood market, but I haven't followed that discussion in a while. https://t.co/lAlJEaKCJK
RT @JaneOrLean: @TroyNaismith1 @BotanDove @cryptanonomous @yogibear951 @Mareq16 here's the original research from China https://t.co/xs5ILD…
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/aCGPg9lW1B
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 https://t.co/vkh2w4qnPj
RT @realhumanrights: @BrianRWasik Brian Wasik-in addition, there are #COVID19 research reports, such as Peking University report, on #SARSC…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
@BrianRWasik @Lilum192 We don't need analogies as much as we need facts. And if other #COVID19 research reports are not accurate, we should clearly say so and why. Peking University report published by Oxford University Press National Science Review http
@BrianRWasik Brian Wasik-in addition, there are #COVID19 research reports, such as Peking University report, on #SARSCoV2, which says there was a distinct L and S strain, and L strain more aggressive. If they are incorrect, useful to be specific https://t.
RT @oliverbeige: L = "traveler" = aggressive, prevalent in 2019, replicates slowly = the visible world S = "local" = benign, prevalent in 2…
RT @interrobangxy: @ElphabaThropp7 Is it this one? https://t.co/LSDo22fQKB
@ElphabaThropp7 Is it this one? https://t.co/LSDo22fQKB
RT @4C0rnFlowerBlue: 論文あった。 https://t.co/9PkQlunWZT
RT @4C0rnFlowerBlue: 論文あった。 https://t.co/9PkQlunWZT
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 | National Science Review | Oxford Academic https://t.co/PK2ceDoqq9
RT @4C0rnFlowerBlue: 論文あった。 https://t.co/9PkQlunWZT
RT @4C0rnFlowerBlue: 論文あった。 https://t.co/9PkQlunWZT
論文あった。 https://t.co/9PkQlunWZT
@masaharu19759 論文出ていますよ。 https://t.co/9PkQlunWZT
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
@tonisfcf @griseldaj @malditobulo NSR (Oxrford): https://t.co/uJPKT021Fm De origen natural: por selección natural y presión selectiva. https://t.co/0s5cDMELqS
RT @ScepticalDoctor: @agargmd https://t.co/qcTMe8zTfu I thought there are 2 strains of SARS-CoV-2 : L and S.
@agargmd https://t.co/qcTMe8zTfu I thought there are 2 strains of SARS-CoV-2 : L and S.
@soraplaza 三月頭に武漢から広まったL型が強力で急激であったと出ている。結局武漢からと言う話をはぐらかそうとして必死なのかなあ日本のマスコミは。それともなんらかの指示かしら。 https://t.co/66Kl5gp3NA
RT @oldo: @ScottGottliebMD This isn't exactly a new discovery. China reported this months ago.. i think it foolish to assume everything is…
RT @oldo: @ScottGottliebMD This isn't exactly a new discovery. China reported this months ago.. i think it foolish to assume everything is…
@copleac @MandoJim @CNN The intermediate animal is possibly involved but not a requirement for it to jump to humans. https://t.co/pC4peDQa9D
RT @oldo: @ScottGottliebMD This isn't exactly a new discovery. China reported this months ago.. i think it foolish to assume everything is…
8. On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 (https://t.co/4L8l0BwbIZ) Quick summary: differences in this coronavirus and other know coronaviruses, how aggressive SARS-CoV-2 seems to be, and how this may give insight into future mutations of the
@ScottGottliebMD This isn't exactly a new discovery. China reported this months ago.. i think it foolish to assume everything is misinformation, especially in regard to scientific studies. Every day.. every hour.. counts here, and ignoring important, earl
@MisterVir @dadovdeon @Dutertenomics @nature Thanks. Tha Nature article is an easier read than https://t.co/pC4peDQa9D
@Dutertenomics This is a good read. https://t.co/pC4peDQa9D
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
@John_Sp4rtan @elmundoes "preliminary" "hace found no clear evidence"... Todo muy demostrado. Eran conjeturas de enero, cuando ni siquiera se había secuenciado.. Aquí tienes algún dato más actualizado y con datos genéticos probados https://t.co/lMCsmkVpjS
And just to back shit up I'm gonna reference John Hopkins Medicine (https://t.co/fatZuiHYxL), and National Science Review (https://t.co/FO3NBpQp9y) https://t.co/hbCyzHeTwA
この論文と https://t.co/bHcByaGmol この論文 https://t.co/vqGCsYToPB のことだな。
RT @ZevShalev: NOTE: Here's where you can read the study. Yes I’m aware questions have been raised about the use of the word “aggressive"…
RT @AnaBandar: بدايةً، ظهرت دراسة (غير منشورة) عن التسلسل الجيني للفيروس والتي اقترحت أن طفرة جينية حصلت في الحمض الاميني رقم 2800 من الجين…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
RT @ZevShalev: NOTE: Here's where you can read the study. Yes I’m aware questions have been raised about the use of the word “aggressive"…
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 | National Science Review | Oxford Academic 03 March 2020 https://t.co/aqQ4ErjJoZ https://t.co/Gx5GBPegyg
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
Covid 2 strains. L-Strain & S-Strain We need to better understand! @TuckerCarlson @seanhannity https://t.co/ZH2dH68EF8
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…
RT @MichaelCoudrey: There are now two recognized strains of the disease. The L strain is more infectious and severe than the ancestral S st…