| Title |
On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
National Science Review, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nsr/nwaa036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaolu Tang, Changcheng Wu, Xiang Li, Yuhe Song, Xinmin Yao, Xinkai Wu, Yuange Duan, Hong Zhang, Yirong Wang, Zhaohui Qian, Jie Cui, Jian Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,949 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 792 | 13% |
| Japan | 521 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 127 | 2% |
| Spain | 88 | 1% |
| Thailand | 86 | 1% |
| France | 75 | 1% |
| Canada | 71 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 66 | 1% |
| Germany | 49 | <1% |
| Other | 779 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3295 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5370 | 90% |
| Scientists | 326 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 180 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 73 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,071 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2071 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 302 | 15% |
| Researcher | 250 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 247 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 181 | 9% |
| Other | 109 | 5% |
| Other | 364 | 18% |
| Unknown | 618 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 352 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 249 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 170 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 94 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 60 | 3% |
| Other | 425 | 21% |
| Unknown | 721 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5988. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#574
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from National Science Review
#1
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52
of 386,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from National Science Review
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.