↓ Skip to main content

The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-10-225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo-An Atkinson, Andrew Vallely, Lisa Fitzgerald, Maxine Whittaker, Marcel Tanner

Abstract

Community engagement and participation has played a critical role in successful disease control and elimination campaigns in many countries. Despite this, its benefits for malaria control and elimination are yet to be fully realized. This may be due to a limited understanding of the influences on participation in developing countries as well as inadequate investment in infrastructure and resources to support sustainable community participation. This paper reports the findings of an atypical systematic review of 60 years of literature in order to arrive at a more comprehensive awareness of the constructs of participation for communicable disease control and elimination and provide guidance for the current malaria elimination campaign.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Indonesia 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 230 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 25%
Researcher 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Other 18 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 30%
Social Sciences 49 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 7%
Environmental Science 12 5%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 35 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,066,213
of 15,341,807 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,249
of 4,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,636
of 126,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,341,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them