↓ Skip to main content

Factors Associated with Late Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation among Adults in Mozambique

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Associated with Late Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation among Adults in Mozambique
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Lahuerta, Josue Lima, Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha, Mie Okamura, Maria Fernanda Alvim, Rufino Fernandes, Americo Assan, David Hoos, Batya Elul, Wafaa M. El-Sadr, Denis Nash

Abstract

Despite recent changes to expand the ART eligibility criteria in sub-Saharan Africa, many patients still initiate ART in the advanced stages of HIV infection, which contributes to increased early mortality rates, poor patient outcomes, and onward transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 137 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 26%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 43%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,750,519
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,358
of 193,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,671
of 163,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,299
of 3,849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.