Cost-effectiveness of Active Identification and Subsequent Colonoscopy Surveillance of Lynch Syndrome Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, October 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source

twitter: 6 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 21 Mendeley

Summary Policy documents X

So far, Altmetric has seen 6 X posts from 6 X users, with an upper bound of 5,567 followers.

RT @CGAIGC: Is the active identification and subsequent colonoscopy surveillance of individuals with Lynch syndrome cost effective? Learn m…

31 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

“Triennial surveillance was more costly and less effective, and annual surveillance showed limited additional benefit compared with biennial surveillance.” Should we be moving towards biennial colonoscopy for most of Lynch patients? @HHampel1 @swatigp @Son

31 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @CGAIGC: Is the active identification and subsequent colonoscopy surveillance of individuals with Lynch syndrome cost effective? Learn m…

30 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @CGAIGC: Is the active identification and subsequent colonoscopy surveillance of individuals with Lynch syndrome cost effective? Learn m…

30 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 2 additional X posts.