You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inhaled Methoxyflurane versus Intravenous Morphine for Severe Trauma Pain in the Emergency Setting: Subgroup Analysis of MEDITA, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s240911 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Antonio Voza, Germana Ruggiano, Sossio Serra, Giuseppe Carpinteri, Gianfilippo Gangitano, Fabio Intelligente, Elisabetta Bonafede, Antonella Sblendido, Alberto Farina, Amedeo Soldi, Andrea Fabbri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 20% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 16% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,359,760
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#567
of 1,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,273
of 384,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#12
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.