↓ Skip to main content

Assessing population‐level consequences of anthropogenic stressors for terrestrial wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosphere, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing population‐level consequences of anthropogenic stressors for terrestrial wildlife
Published in
Ecosphere, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/ecs2.3046
Authors

Todd E. Katzner, Melissa A. Braham, Tara J. Conkling, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Adam E. Duerr, Scott R. Loss, David M. Nelson, Hannah B. Vander Zanden, Julie L. Yee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 21%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 32 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,709,395
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Ecosphere
#1,158
of 3,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,252
of 387,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosphere
#20
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.