You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Land Trusts as Conservation Boundary Organizations in Rapidly Exurbanizing Landscapes: A Case Study from Southern Appalachia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Society & Natural Resources, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/08941920.2020.1731034 |
| Authors |
Katherine Brownson, Jessica Chappell, Jason Meador, Jennifer Bloodgood, Jillian Howard, Linda Kosen, Hannah Burnett, Tara Gancos-Crawford, Elizabeth Guinessey, Nik Heynen, Caitlin Mertzlufft, Sebastian Ortiz, Catherine Pringle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 88% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,303,330
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Society & Natural Resources
#227
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,796
of 386,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Society & Natural Resources
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.