You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic effects of insect meal from Tenebrio molitor L. in growing pigs by transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40104-020-0425-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Meyer, Denise K. Gessner, Maria S. Braune, Theresa Friedhoff, Erika Most, Marcus Höring, Gerhard Liebisch, Holger Zorn, Klaus Eder, Robert Ringseis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2020.
All research outputs
#16,443,300
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#323
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,437
of 388,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.