You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Flow Cytometry-Based FRET Assay to Identify and Analyse Protein-Protein Interactions in Living Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0009344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carina Banning, Jörg Votteler, Dirk Hoffmann, Herwig Koppensteiner, Martin Warmer, Rudolph Reimer, Frank Kirchhoff, Ulrich Schubert, Joachim Hauber, Michael Schindler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 11 | 3% |
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 404 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 115 | 27% |
| Researcher | 93 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 61 | 14% |
| Unknown | 65 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 159 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 21% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 36 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 21 | 5% |
| Engineering | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#15,603,033
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#134,277
of 198,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,690
of 94,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#545
of 669 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 669 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.