↓ Skip to main content

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 39,727)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
18666 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17503 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
The Lancet, March 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30566-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Zhou, Ting Yu, Ronghui Du, Guohui Fan, Ying Liu, Zhibo Liu, Jie Xiang, Yeming Wang, Bin Song, Xiaoying Gu, Lulu Guan, Yuan Wei, Hui Li, Xudong Wu, Jiuyang Xu, Shengjin Tu, Yi Zhang, Hua Chen, Bin Cao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,564 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17,503 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17503 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2074 12%
Student > Bachelor 2062 12%
Student > Master 1703 10%
Other 1388 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1286 7%
Other 3823 22%
Unknown 5167 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5555 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1104 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 819 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 539 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 531 3%
Other 2884 16%
Unknown 6071 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#86
of 22,192,088 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#11
of 39,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 290,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#3
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,192,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.