↓ Skip to main content

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 35,318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
5627 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9449 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
The Lancet, March 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30566-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Zhou, Ting Yu, Ronghui Du, Guohui Fan, Ying Liu, Zhibo Liu, Jie Xiang, Yeming Wang, Bin Song, Xiaoying Gu, Lulu Guan, Yuan Wei, Hui Li, Xudong Wu, Jiuyang Xu, Shengjin Tu, Yi Zhang, Hua Chen, Bin Cao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13,764 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9,449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9449 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1412 15%
Student > Master 983 10%
Other 976 10%
Student > Bachelor 970 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 843 9%
Other 2342 25%
Unknown 1923 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3514 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 609 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 391 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 360 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 297 3%
Other 1684 18%
Unknown 2594 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13605. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#29
of 16,061,343 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#6
of 35,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 261,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#2
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,061,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.