↓ Skip to main content

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 28,308)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1429 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2544 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.3786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenling Wang, Yanli Xu, Ruqin Gao, Roujian Lu, Kai Han, Guizhen Wu, Wenjie Tan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,413 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,544 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2544 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 417 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 255 10%
Student > Bachelor 239 9%
Other 237 9%
Student > Master 230 9%
Other 671 26%
Unknown 495 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 861 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 220 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 113 4%
Engineering 84 3%
Other 463 18%
Unknown 667 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3340. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#631
of 16,094,294 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#34
of 28,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92
of 261,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#8
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.