You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Modeling Phage–Bacteria Dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Immunoinformatics
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0389-5_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160388-8, 978-1-07-160389-5
|
| Authors |
Saptarshi Sinha, Rajdeep Kaur Grewal, Soumen Roy, Sinha, Saptarshi, Grewal, Rajdeep Kaur, Roy, Soumen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,674,456
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,697
of 13,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,782
of 457,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#30
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.