↓ Skip to main content

The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions

Overview of attention for article published in Law and Philosophy, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 110)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dilemmas of Constitutional Courts and the Case for a New Design of Kelsenian Institutions
Published in
Law and Philosophy, March 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10982-020-09378-3
Authors

Castillo-Ortiz, Pablo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#873,307
of 14,575,239 outputs
Outputs from Law and Philosophy
#4
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,855
of 173,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law and Philosophy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,575,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them