↓ Skip to main content

Utility and usability of intrinsic tag maps

Overview of attention for article published in Cartography and Geographic Information Science, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility and usability of intrinsic tag maps
Published in
Cartography and Geographic Information Science, March 2020
DOI 10.1080/15230406.2020.1732835
Authors

Nai Yang, Alan M. MacEachren, Emily Domanico

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,612,809
of 17,379,776 outputs
Outputs from Cartography and Geographic Information Science
#55
of 210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,193
of 271,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cartography and Geographic Information Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,379,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them